CPE | How to Stop Rubber-Stamping User Access Reviews within Regulated Applications

#1684056: CPE | How to Stop Rubber-Stamping User Access Reviews within Regulated Applications

Description:	Jason Gzym, IGA & Compliance Expert \| VP of Solutions Eng. & Customer Advisory at Pathlock About this talk Earn 1.5 CPE Credits on this webinar Most User Access Reviews (UARs), especially in SOX-scope applications and other regulated environments like SAP, Oracle, and Workday, are performed to meet compliance requirements — not because they drive meaningful security outcomes. They’re repetitive, rubber-stamped, and void of risk context. This session will explore how to bring real value into the UAR process. Instead of treating it like a checkbox exercise, we’ll show how to align reviews with business risk, improve review accuracy, and give reviewers the context they need to make better decisions — all without overloading them. You’ll learn how to: - Improve the efficiency of UARs by focusing reviews on high-risk access - Close the gap between compliance and security with smarter, risk-informed decisions - Simplify the reviewer experience to reduce friction and avoid rubber-stamping If you’ve ever felt like your user access review process didn't lead to an improved security posture, this session will provide key lessons on meeting that objective.
More info:	https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/5586/644699?utm_source=ccorg1

Description:

Jason Gzym, IGA & Compliance Expert | VP of Solutions Eng. & Customer Advisory at Pathlock

About this talk
Earn 1.5 CPE Credits on this webinar

Most User Access Reviews (UARs), especially in SOX-scope applications and other regulated environments like SAP, Oracle, and Workday, are performed to meet compliance requirements — not because they drive meaningful security outcomes. They’re repetitive, rubber-stamped, and void of risk context.

This session will explore how to bring real value into the UAR process. Instead of treating it like a checkbox exercise, we’ll show how to align reviews with business risk, improve review accuracy, and give reviewers the context they need to make better decisions — all without overloading them.

You’ll learn how to:
- Improve the efficiency of UARs by focusing reviews on high-risk access
- Close the gap between compliance and security with smarter, risk-informed decisions
- Simplify the reviewer experience to reduce friction and avoid rubber-stamping

If you’ve ever felt like your user access review process didn't lead to an improved security posture, this session will provide key lessons on meeting that objective.

More info:

https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/5586/644699?utm_source=ccorg1

Date added	May 30, 2025, 7:47 p.m.
Source	BrightTalk
Subjects	Compliance regulations / Ethics - Various PodCasts / Webcast / Webinar / eSummit / Virtual Event etc.
Venue	June 10, 2025, midnight - June 10, 2025, midnight